Clara Caruana from Burmula, wife of Filippo retratcs her case against Paulo Vassallo for an assault.

The priest D. Mattheo Busuttil and Veronica his sister from Tarxien complain that they had submitted their papers for the commencement of a case concerning their censi bollari but the proceedings had stalled for more than a month.

Carmina Assenza reports that he had seen Pasquale Grima and Maria Fabre running about in each other's company, even though she had recently almost killed him. Other testimonies collected. Maria was married but her husband had been absent from Malta for many years, and she lived as a widow. The two had had carnal relations, and as a result Grima was beaten and Fabre exiled to Senglea. This witnessed meeting of theirs occurred in contravention of the Court's orders.

Antonius Revest had wounded himself with a dagger during Carnival during the previous Carnival following some argument with members of his family, and had since been held under house arrest. He requests permission to leave. Judge Hioachino Borg supports the request, which was granted.

Maria Ciaramet, widow of Marco, from Senglea complains that Johannes Cini had forced himself into her home. At the same time, Maria Barabella complains that Ciaramet, her neighbour, is of terrible repute and behaviour and demands that she is exiled. She makes various allegations against her, including that she wanted to poison her daughters and that she spread false rumours about them. Ciaramet was placed under house arrest.

Felice Mallia accuses Mattheo di Rotru of seriously wounding the slave Abdalla son of Ibrahim in the head. The slave was attacked in Senglea while carrying out duties for his master.

Part of a witness statement by an unknown person and another statement by Johannes Maria Camilleri and Johannes Paulus Felici as court experts, concerning the transport on land by burdonari of frumento and orzo.

Gateano Mallia wishes the judge appointed to hear the case between him and Catarina Rostan in the civil court of the Magna Curia Castellania to be changed, as he had been changed due to a conflict of interest in a similar case.

Cap. Domenicus Attard, nightwatchman in Valletta reports that while in Burmula the previous night at the house of a certain Maria, who was blind in one eye, and her Venetian lover, where he found out that there had been an armed quarrel between the Venetian and a certain Arbni who was the lover of a certain Nena, friend of Maria.

Domenicus Grima reports that a sentence was handed down against him on 22 January 1710 at the instigation of Alessandro Magri, and that he and the deceased Michaele Calleia were ordered to pay Magri 13% of the total sum that he had procured for them as their procurator from the debtors of Josephus Ciarlet, who himself owed them money. He seeks to appeal due to the emergence of new legal advice on the basis of new evidence.

Bonaventura Bonnici rejects the claims and terms lodged against her and her husband by Domenicus Mompalao. The claim seems to concern rent.

Unclear due to sever water staining and loss of words. It seems one of the parties was seeking alternative housing to vacate the contested property.

Appeal against the sentence issued in favour of Generosa []

Pompeo Fiore rejects the claims made by his adversary (name unclear).

Unclear due to sever water staining and loss of words.

Prosecution of a certain Abela for blasphemy. Top part of the document torn away.

The barber Franciscus Azzopardi testifies that two years ago he had travelled to Zebbug with Salvo Calabro and others with a pack mule carrying grain. The grain was for a certain Mattheus who refused to purchase all of it. Unclear what was being asked. Top part of the document torn away.

Top part of the document missing. Mattheus Pace demands that Petrus De Amato prove under oath that he had indeed paid the 100 scudi which had been owed. Unclear what the debt was for but it seems that one of the folios may have contained an excerpt from a contract.

Nicola Bonnici accuses Giulio Barbara of breaking into the bottega in Valletta that he was renting from Bonnici and stealing everything he could find. Barbara claimed that he had leased the bottega to Bonnici but since he had regretted the contract he had chosen to accuse him of theft instead. He was acquitted.

Dispute over the payment of court fees for previous proceedings in light of lodged appeals.